City Planner, Mediator, and MIT Professor

Publications


  • Lawrence Susskind
    Alexis Schulman
    Michael Kraft
    Sheldon Kamieniecki

    Environmental Policy Evaluation And The Prospects For Public Learning

    Oxford Handbook of Environmental Policy

    This article reviews conventional approaches to environmental policy evaluation, outlines their presumed relevance to policy making and implementation, and points out the main reasons why they have been subject to challenge. It contrasts the conventional approach to environmental policy evaluation—which presumes the identity of the policy analyst is unimportant—with the “collaborative approach,” which emphasizes the need to engage relevant stakeholders (i.e., the users of policy analyses and those affected by them) in the process of environmental policy evaluation. The article also describes the emergence of “adaptive” approaches to resource management and sustainable development, and explains why they represent an important shift away from emphasizing “success” and “failure” in environmental policy making and toward ongoing public learning for purposes of improvement.


  • Lawrence Susskind
    Jeffrey Cruikshank
    Carrie Menkel-Meadow

    What is Consensus?

    Multi-Party Dispute Resolution, Democracy and Decision-Making Volume II

    The articles selected for this volume draw on game theory, political science, psychology, sociology and anthropology to consider how the process of dispute resolution is altered, challenged and made more complex by the presence of multiple parties and/or multiple issues. The volume explores issues of coalition formation, defection, collaboration, commitments, voting practices, and joint decision making in settings of increasing human complexity. Also included are examples of concrete uses of deliberative democracy processes taken from new applications of complex dispute resolution theory and practice. The selected essays represent the latest theoretical advances and challenges in the field and demonstrate attempts to use dispute resolution theory in a wide variety of settings such as political decision making and policy formation; regulatory matters; environmental disputes; healthcare; community disputes; constitutional formation; and in many other controversial issues in the polity.


  • Lawrence Susskind
    Shafiqul Islam

    Water Diplomacy: Creating Value and Building Trust in Transboundary Water Negotiations

    Science and Diplomacy
    1

  • Lawrence Susskind
    Tijs van Maasakkers
    Kees Zoeteman

    Building Consensus for Sustainable Development

    Sustainable Development Drivers: The Role of Leadership in Government, Business and NGO Performance

    Sustainable development cannot be prescribed – rather, it results from conscious personal choices in government, business and NGOs. This thought-provoking book explores both the origins and future of the global sustainable development movement, and provides an original overview of the driving forces of sustainable development, including market forces and past and future trends.


  • Lawrence Susskind

    The Consensus Building Approach

    AGORA Autostrade per I’Italia
    1

  • Lawrence Susskind
    Bernard Mayer
    Joseph Stulberg
    John Lande

    Core Values of Dispute Resolution: Is Neutrality Necessary?

    Marquette Law Review
    95

  • Lawrence Susskind
    Patrick Field

    Dealing with an Angrier Public Part 1

    ACResolution: The Quarterly Magazine of the Association for Conflict Resolution
    12

    In 1996, we published the book Dealing with an Angry Public. In it we raised concerns about the distrustful attitudes that citizens have toward government and corporations, and the inability of these institutions to respond to public concerns in a robust, inclusive, and effective way. We put forward six principles that might help win back the public’s trust. We expected that leaders and organizations that adopted these principles would be better off.


  • Lawrence Susskind
    Patrick Field

    Dealing with an Angrier Public Part Two

    ACResolutions Magazine: The Quarterly Magazine of the Association for Conflict Resolution
    12

  • Lawrence Susskind

    Integrated Joint Fact-Finding

    iJFF Conference

    A videotaped lecture by Professor Susskind (MIT, Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning) on joint fact-finding process at the iJFF conference in Tokyo, March 6, 2012.


  • Lawrence Susskind

    New Tools for Democratic Decision-Making


  • Lawrence Susskind

    Professor Lawrence Susskind and Dealing with an Angry Public

    This is a segment taken from the Program on Negotiation's "Negotiation Pedagogy Video Series, Part Two." In this video, MIT Professor Lawrence Susskind uses the case "Teflex Products" to teach an Executive Education Seminar about how to deal with an angry public.


  • Lawrence Susskind
    Ona Ferguson
    Meredith Sciarrio

    International Relations Negotiation Role-Play: Negotiating with Another Federal Agency

    Two, separate, two-person, non-scorable negotiations: one between Technical Co-chairs from the Center for Disease Control and USAID; the other between a CDC Technical Co-Chair and the Minister of Health in the imaginary host country of Sabada.


  • Lawrence Susskind
    Ona Ferguson
    Meredith Sciarrio

    International Relations Negotiation Role-Play: Negotiating with the Ministry of Health

    Two, separate, two-person, non-scorable negotiations: one between Technical Co-chairs from the Center for Disease Control and USAID; the other between a CDC Technical Co-Chair and the Minister of Health in the imaginary host country of Sabada.


  • Lawrence Susskind
    Elizabeth Fierman
    David Fairman
    David Plumb
    Philip Angell
    Kelly Levin

    Climate Change Negotiation Role-Play: Prioritizing Climate Change Adaptation Measures Agricultural Planning in the Bien Gio River Delta

    Eight-party negotiation (with option for a ninth person facilitator) regarding climate change issues in a situation loosely based on the situation in Viet Nam.


  • Lawrence Susskind
    Todd Schenk
    Alejandro Camacho

    A critical assessment of collaborative adaptive management in practice

    Journal of Applied Ecology
    49

    This article examines the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program (AMP) in the United States, and other CAM efforts, to illustrate why and how procedural shortcomings may lead to natural resource management failures and reflect on how they may be overcome.


  • Lawrence Susskind

    The Quarterly Magazine of the Association for Conflict Resolution

    Dispute Resolution Magazine
    17

  • Lawrence Susskind

    Learning from Practice in the Face of Conflict and Integrating Technical Expertise with Participatory Planning: Critical Commentaries on the Practice of Planner-Architect Laurence Sherman Mediation and Collaboration in Architecture and Community Planning:

    Planning Theory and Practice
    12

    In the practice stories and commentaries that follow, good practice leads and inspires good theory. We will read about transportation planning and environmental management, about community involvement and multi-stakeholder negotiations, and throughout about deftly bringing technical expertise into play to inform creative proposals while working within specified budget constraints. We will read about early and even virtual negotiations among building users to inform architects' design choices and their more or less productive professional roles too. And there's much more


  • Lawrence Susskind

    Hoping to avoid or resolve a dispute? First fix your contract: Negotiators would be wise to distinguish between control and coordination provisions when drafting contracts

    Negotiation Newsletter
    14

  • Lawrence Susskind
    Nancy Bradish Myers
    Anne Petruska McNickle

    Learning the Art and Science of Negotiation: Tools for All User Fee Stakeholders

    PDUFA and the Expansion of FDA User Fees: Lessons from Negotiators

    Since passage of the first Prescription Drug User Fee Act almost 20 years ago, user fee negotiations and the legislative vehicles that authorize them have significantly changed the scope of FDA’s responsibilities. After PDUFA paved the way to the acceptance of user fees, programs were created for other FDA-regulated industries, such as medical devices, animal drugs, generic animal drugs and tobacco. Several additional user fee programs are on the horizon, such as those for generic human drugs and biosimilars. Are you and your organization ready to engage in a smart, educated manner?

    There are many issues that reach across user fee programs. This book addresses: What approaches have been taken by FDA and the regulated industries to the various user fee programs? What can the history of prescription drug and medical device user fee negotiations tell us about future negotiations? What strategies worked in the past? What are the lessons learned that can be applied across all stakeholders?

    Chapters explore the history leading to the first user fee program (PDUFA), the biopharmaceutical industry perspective on negotiating user fees, a first-of-its-kind view of negotiations from the FDA lens, a clear explanation of Congress’ role in enacting user fees, insight into how user fees expanded to medical devices, advice from professional negotiators on how to bring new tools to the negotiation table and overall lessons learned for all stakeholders.

    This book serves as a guide to stakeholders preparing for any user fee negotiation, whether it’s for a new program, or reauthorization of an existing one. The book draws on the institutional knowledge of many of the most experienced user fee negotiators, affording a unique 360-degree view of the evolving nature of such negotiations; it offers practical insights not only for those at the negotiating table, but for anyone involved in helping to shape, analyze, monitor or understand user fee programs.


  • Lawrence Susskind
    Francisco Ingouville

    Beyond Majority Rule: A New Way to Run Meetings, Build Consensus, Improve Relationships, and Maximize Results for Everyone

    Every day in communities across America hundreds of committees, boards, church groups, and social clubs hold meetings where they spend their time engaged in shouting matches and acrimonious debate. Whether they are aware of it or not, the procedures that most such groups rely on to reach decisions were first laid out as Robert's Rules more than 150 years ago by an officer in the U.S. Army's Corps of Engineers. Its arcane rituals of parliamentary procedure and majority rule usually produce a victorious majority and a very dissatisfied minority that expects to raise its concerns, again, at the next possible meeting.

    Breaking Robert's Rules clearly spells out how any group can work together effectively. After briefly explaining the problems created by Robert's Rules, the guide outlines the five key steps toward consensus building, and addresses the specific problems that often get in the way of a group's progress. Appendices include a basic one page "Handy Guide" that can be distributed at meetings and a case study demonstrating how the ideas presented in the book can also be applied in a corporate context.

    Written in a non-technical and engaging style, and containing clear ideas and instructions that anyone can understand and use, this one-of-a-kind guide will prove an essential tool for any group desperate to find ways of making their meetings more effective. In addition, neighborhood associations, ad hoc committees, social clubs, and other informal groups lacking a clear hierarchy will find solid advice on how to move forward without resorting to "majority rules" or bickering over who will take leadership positions. Bound to become a classic, Breaking Robert's Rules will change the way you hold meetings forever, paving the way for efficiency, efficacy, and peaceful decision making.

    Spanish Language Edition