Biblio
“Deliberative Democracy Meets Dispute Resolution Reflections And Insights From The 2005 Workshop On Deliberative Democracy And Dispute Resolution, Cambridge, Massachusetts”. Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School, 2006. http://www.pon.harvard.edu/shop/deliberative-democracy-meets-dispute-resolution-reflections-and-insights-from-the-2005-workshop-on-deliberative-democracy-and-dispute-resolution-cambridge-massachusetts/.
. “Arguing, Bargaining And Getting Agreement”. In Oxford Handbook Of Public Policy. 1stst ed. Oxford Handbook Of Public Policy. Oxford University Press, 2005.
. .
“Consensus Building And Adr: Why They Are Not The Same Thing!”. In. 1stst ed. Jossey-Bass, 2005.
. “Improvisation And Mediation: Balancing Acts”. Negotiation Journal 21, no. 4. Negotiation Journal (2005). doi:10.1111/j.1571-9979.2005.00074.x.
. “Religious And Ideological Dimensions Of The Israeli Settlements Issue: Reframing The Narrative?”. Negotiation Journal 21, no. 2. Negotiation Journal (2005): 177-191. doi:10.1111/j.1571-9979.2005.00056.x.
. “Risk Perception, Risk Communication, And Stakeholder Involvement For Biosolids Management And Research.”. The Journal Of Environmental Quality 34, no. 1. The Journal Of Environmental Quality (2005).
. “Expanding The Ethical Obligations Of The Mediator: Mediator Accountability To Parties Not At The Table”. In What's Fair: Ethics For Negotiators. What's Fair: Ethics For Negotiators. Jossey-Bass, 2004.
. “Expert Views On Sustainability And Technology Implementation”. International Journal Of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 11, no. 3. International Journal Of Sustainable Development & World Ecology (2004): 247 - 261. doi:10.1080/13504500409469829.
. “Making Regional Policy Dialogues Work: A Credo For Metro-Scale Consensus Building”. Temple Environmental Law & Technology Journal 12, no. 2. Temple Environmental Law & Technology Journal (2004). http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic/?verb=sr&csi=270077&sr=cite%2822%20Temp.%20Envtl.%20L.%20&%20Tech.%20J.%20123%29.
. .
“Mediating Land Use Disputes In The United States: Pros And Cons”. Environments: A Journal Of Interdisciplinary Studies, Special Issue On Collaborative Planning And Sustainable Resource Management: The North American Experience 31, no. 2. Environments: A Journal Of Interdisciplinary Studies, Special Issue On Collaborative Planning And Sustainable Resource Management: The North American Experience (2003): 39-58.
. “Multistakeholder Dialogue At The Global Scale”. International Negotiation Journal 8, no. 2. International Negotiation Journal (2003): 235-266. doi:10.1163/157180603322576121.
. “What Do We Know About Training World Class Negotiators?”. In The Change Champion's Field Guide: Strategies And Tools For Leading Change In Your Organization. 1stst ed. The Change Champion's Field Guide: Strategies And Tools For Leading Change In Your Organization. Wiley, 2003.
. “Building Consensus: Dealing With Controversial Land Use Issues & Disputes”. Planning Commissioners Journal no. 48. Planning Commissioners Journal (2002): 16-19.
. “Expert Views On Sustainability And Technology Implementation ”. Natural And Social Science Interface (Uns). Natural And Social Science Interface (Uns), 2002.
. “Overcoming The Barriers To Environmental Dispute Resolution In Canada”. Canadian Bar Review 81. Canadian Bar Review (2002): 396-430.
. “A Seven Step Model Of Planning Practice And Classic Readings From The Planning Field”. Department of Urban Studies and Planning, MIT, 2002.
. .
“Could Florida Election Dispute Have Been Mediated? Yes: Mediation Would Have Produced A Much More Legitimate Outcome”. Dispute Resolution Magazine 8, no. 1. Dispute Resolution Magazine (2001). http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/disput8&id=1&collection=journals&index=.
. .
“The Secondary Effects Of Environmental Justice Litigation: The Case Of West Dallas Coalition For Environmental Justice V. Epa”. Virginia Environmental Law Journal 20. Virginia Environmental Law Journal (2001): 431-477. http://www.velj.org/the-secondary-effects-of-environmental-justice-litigation.html.
. “Super-Optimization: A New Approach To National Environmental Policymaking”. In Handbook Of Public Policy Evaluation. 1stst ed. Handbook Of Public Policy Evaluation. SAGE Publications, 2001.
.